DBUNK Logo

Fact-Checked Articles

Browse articles verified by our research team with transparent sources

Top Fact Checks

Cuba Blasts New U.S. Sanctions After Trump Targets President Díaz-Canel, His Family and Raúl Castro's Inner Circle

Cuba Blasts New U.S. Sanctions After Trump Targets President Díaz-Canel, His Family and Raúl Castro's Inner Circle

Latin Times

Cuba's government lashed out at Washington after the Trump administration imposed a sweeping new round of sanctions on President Miguel Díaz-Canel, his wife, his stepson, relatives of Raúl Castro and five key Cuban entities, escalating a pressure campaign that is now reaching not only the island's formal leadership but also family networks around the ruling elite.

Verified checkmarkFact Checked (1)
Advice Column: Navigating Family Trauma, Favoritism, and Healing

Advice Column: Navigating Family Trauma, Favoritism, and Healing

Headtopics

In this advice column, Caroline West-Mead addresses two sensitive family issues: a mother's concern about her daughters' enduring trauma from exposure to their father's inappropriate sexual behavior and his new wife's conduct, and a parent's dilemma regarding perceived grandparent favoritism. The first query details a 21-year-old's ongoing nightmares and flashbacks, the older sister's protective role, and the mother's struggle with anger and the urge to see her ex's good side. The second query describes teenage daughters noticing their grandfather's preferential treatment of their male cousins and the parents' conflict between confronting the issue and avoiding family rift. Caroline offers insights on trauma healing, the importance of acknowledging harm, suitable therapeutic approaches like EMDR, and the need for supportive boundaries. She also cautions against direct confrontation in favoritism cases, suggesting indirect strategies to ensure children feel valued. The column underscores the long-lasting impact of childhood emotional neglect and the complexities of family dynamics.

Verified checkmarkFact Checked (1)
Cockroach Janta Party Protest: Why Thousands Gathered at Jantar Mantar

Cockroach Janta Party Protest: Why Thousands Gathered at Jantar Mantar

Industry Wired

Cockroach Janta Party Protest at Jantar Mantar Gains Momentum Over Exam Accountability Hundreds of students, young professionals and parents gathered at Jantar Mantar today as the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) held a protest over alleged irregularities in examinations and recruitment tests. The protest, which is still underway, has brought exam transparency and accountability back into the spotlight. Many participants wore cockroach masks, carried flowers and waved the national flag while demanding the resignation of Union Education Minister Dharmendra Pradhan. CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke arrived in Delhi after returning from the US earlier in the day. Before the protest, he urged supporters to maintain peace, carry books and offer flowers to police personnel as a gesture of respect. Delhi Police deployed more than 1,000 personnel across the capital. Security was strengthened at the airport, border points and other sensitive locations ahead of the gathering. From Social Media Campaign to Street Protest Today’s demonstration is the biggest public mobilisation by the Cockroach Janta Party so far. The movement began online and gained support among students unhappy with controversies linked to examinations such as NEET, CUET, CBSE and SSC recruitment tests. Over the past month, CJP expanded its campaign on social media and repeatedly demanded the resignation of the education minister. Earlier this week, Dipke announced that he would return from Boston to lead a peaceful protest in Delhi. CJP spokesperson Saurav Das later said police had granted permission for the demonstration at Jantar Mantar. Dipke Attacks Government Response Addressing supporters at the venue, Dipke stated the campaign had been running for nearly a month. He accused authorities of ignoring demands for accountability and claimed attempts had been made to restrict the group's online reach. ‘You can delete our posts, but you cannot erase us from this space,’ he told the crowd, drawing loud cheers from supporters. The gathering included school and college students, working professionals and parents. Organizers repeatedly appealed for non-violent conduct and asked participants to avoid confrontation. Security Tightened in Maharashtra and Delhi Police also increased security outside Dipke's residence in the Waluj MIDC area of Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar in Maharashtra before his arrival in India. Officials said the move was aimed at preventing unnecessary crowding. Local police indicated that additional personnel could be deployed if required. Education reformer and climate activist Sonam Wangchuk has expressed support for the movement. Earlier this week, he confirmed he would join the protest if Dharmendra Pradhan did not step down by June 5. What Happens Next The protest has become a test of whether an online student-led campaign can translate into sustained public pressure on education-related issues. The turnout at Jantar Mantar has given the movement its biggest show of strength yet and ensured that questions around examination management and recruitment processes remain part of the national conversation.

Verified checkmarkFact Checked (1)
Yemen: Huthis Should Free UN, Civil Society Staff

Yemen: Huthis Should Free UN, Civil Society Staff

Amnesty International

The de facto Huthi authorities in Yemen should immediately and unconditionally release the dozens of staff from the United Nations and Yemeni and international civil society organizations who have been arbitrarily detained over the last two years, Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies, Human Rights Watch, and Amnesty International said today. The Huthis’ arbitrary arrests of humanitarian workers has a direct impact on the delivery of lifesaving assistance to people in critical need of aid. [...] The post Yemen: Huthis Should Free UN, Civil Society Staff appeared first on Amnesty International .

Verified checkmarkFact Checked (1)
Federal officials accused of 'strange secrecy' as court cases fast-tracked

Federal officials accused of 'strange secrecy' as court cases fast-tracked

Raw Story

Lawyers representing immigrants being swept up by the Department of Homeland Security are raising the alarm that federal authorities are deploying new tactics to fast-track deportations. According to New York Times reporting, federal officials have begun pushing dozens of additional cases onto court dockets on specific days to rapidly process asylum and other immigration claims. The secret acceleration started without any public notification from the administration. The impact has been dramatic, observers told the Times. Some immigration judges have seen their caseloads double and triple, raising concerns that cases are being processed too quickly for proper legal review. The Executive Office for Immigration Review, the Justice Department agency overseeing the immigration court system, defended the larger caseloads as a result of hiring new judges and described them as necessary to address a backlog of more than 3 million cases this year. But immigration lawyers and rights groups argue the acceleration creates a fundamentally unfair process . "Everything related to these large dockets or mass dockets is shrouded in such a strange secrecy," Gracie Willis, an attorney with the National Immigration Project, told the Times. "Our confirmation that they were even happening really came from going to the court on Monday and seeing the large lines of people standing outside," she claimed, referring to proceedings she observed in New Orleans. Lawyers reported witnessing judges processing groups of people simultaneously despite their different cases and legal claims. In one instance, a judge heard 15 people at once, cycling through Arabic, Spanish, and Creole interpretations. On a single Monday and Tuesday, the Times is reporting, 89 people in one court were declared absent and therefore deportable. "And that is not because they were 'the worst of the worst.' It is because they had a hearing scheduled that they were not able to attend for a variety of reasons," Willis stated. The administration's push comes amid broader upheaval in Trump's immigration strategy. The report notes that on Friday, a federal judge rejected the government's indefinite hold on asylum applications filed with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and on immigration applications from 39 countries where people had been unable to obtain green cards and citizenship. That ruling is not expected to significantly impact immigration court proceedings.

Verified checkmarkFact Checked (1)
'She just goes a little haywire': Nancy Mace's past catches up with her primary bid

'She just goes a little haywire': Nancy Mace's past catches up with her primary bid

Raw Story

Rep. Nancy Mace’s attempt to leap from the House of Representatives to the governor’s mansion in South Carolina has more difficulties than Donald Trump ignoring her and endorsing opponent Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette. As part of a Politico interview with the controversial lawmaker, who still considers herself “MAGA” despite the president turning his back on her, one South Carolina GOP insider claimed she has enough personal baggage to give conservative voters pause. Trump's endorsement of Evette carries decisive weight in South Carolina's reliably Republican environment. Historical voting patterns suggest Evette has effectively secured her place in a runoff, leaving Mace and three other Republicans scrambling for the second ballot spot. According to the report, the turning point for the GOP lawmaker came in November, when Mace's public meltdown at Charleston Airport generated national headlines. According to an airport authority report, Mace unleashed a profanity-laced tirade at law enforcement officers and TSA agents for failing to meet her at a prearranged pickup location—even as they walked her to her flight. The incident proved more damaging than expected. "I think the airport thing hurt her more than the [Epstein] thing," said Terry Sullivan, a longtime South Carolina Republican operative unaffiliated in the race. "She's had really strong debate performances, she's articulate, she's right on the issues for these folks, but then she just goes a little haywire." Mace's response only amplified the damage. Days after the incident, she held a Charleston press conference defending her actions and dismissing the airport authority's report as a "political hit job." "Did I drop an f-bomb? I hope I did," she said at the time, a statement that drew swift rebukes from fellow South Carolina Republicans. Sen. Tim Scott issued a blistering statement condemning her language and treatment of airport officials. Sen. Lindsey Graham piled on with criticism of his own. Months later, Mace remains defiant. She attributed her airport confrontations to threats against her safety and the alleged partisan harassment she endures. "I get over a thousand death threats a year, and I'm the only one that doesn't get security when traveling. In fact, the last three times I've had an altercation or been accosted has been at an airport, particularly the Charleston airport, because the left has lost their mind," she told Politico.

Verified checkmarkFact Checked (1)
'Recipe for disaster': Alarm as unearthed ICE plan stokes fears of 'terrorizing' Americans

'Recipe for disaster': Alarm as unearthed ICE plan stokes fears of 'terrorizing' Americans

Raw Story

An internal government document obtained by 404 Media reveals that Immigration and Customs Enforcement plans to arm more than 1,200 local police departments with a "flawed" facial recognition app capable of scanning anyone's face — no warrant, no consent, no notice required. The app, called the ICE Task Force Module, would run face photos against a database of more than 250 million DHS and State Department records to determine whether someone is subject to deportation. The document — a Privacy Threshold Analysis filed by ICE's own privacy unit — acknowledges that U.S. citizens will inevitably be swept up in the scans. Every photo taken, whether it matches a target or not, gets stored for 15 years. The technology would be distributed to agencies enrolled in the 287(g) program, which currently includes 1,220 departments across 32 states and two U.S. territories. Those local officers, the New York Civil Liberties Union has argued , are essentially turned into ICE agents. Civil liberties groups say the plan is a disaster waiting to happen — and point to a track record that backs them up. In April 2025, Juan Carlos Lopez-Gomez , a U.S. citizen with his Social Security card in hand, was arrested and held for 30 hours after ICE's facial recognition system wrongly flagged him as an unauthorized alien. Nate Wessler, deputy director of the ACLU's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, told 404 Media the plan is built on a broken foundation. "This embarrassingly cursory document utterly fails to acknowledge the harms that will flow from putting a flawed face recognition app in the hands of many thousands of local police," Wessler said. "Sending local cops out to indiscriminately scan our faces, with a system that is known to generate false matches, that saves our data for 15 years, and that ensnares police into making immigration decisions that they are untrained for and that will undermine community safety efforts, is a recipe for disaster and for terrorizing members of communities across the country. DHS's privacy regulators fell down on the job. Now it's up to lawmakers to ensure this dangerous technology stays off our streets." Jake Laperruque, deputy director of the Center for Democracy & Technology's Security and Surveillance Project, warned when an earlier version of the app briefly surfaced on the Google Play Store that handing "this powerful tech to police is like asking a 16-year old who just failed their drivers exams to pick a dozen classmates to hand car keys to." Cooper Quintin, a security researcher and senior public interest technologist with the Electronic Frontier Foundation, told 404 Media the new document confirms the worst. "Face surveillance was already a dangerous infringement of civil liberties in the hands of ICE agents," Quintin said. "Putting it in the hands of ICE's local partners will subject even more Americans to omnipresent surveillance and unjust detainment."

Verified checkmarkFact Checked (1)
Philly City Council passes more bills to tighten smoke shop, kratom enforcement

Philly City Council passes more bills to tighten smoke shop, kratom enforcement

Headtopics

Philadelphia's City Council passed legislation to further tighten rules on smoke shops selling unregulated drugs like hemp and kratom

Verified checkmarkFact Checked (1)
House passes Ukraine security aid bill over objections of GOP leaders

House passes Ukraine security aid bill over objections of GOP leaders

Headtopics

The bipartisan bill is the most robust aid package for Ukraine to advance in Congress in more than a year.

Verified checkmarkFact Checked (2)
Comatose Trump's own words are coming back to haunt him

Comatose Trump's own words are coming back to haunt him

Raw Story

I had a great uncle who was notorious for sleeping sitting straight up in his chair. His eyes would glaze over as family conversations swirled around him. Inevitably, his eyes would shut, and whether it was a dream or the shrill sound of his wife’s laugh, his eyes would pop open. He was always teased about his frequent chair napping, and he always, always denied he was sleeping. “Just resting my eyes,” he would insist. Then he’d “rest his eyes” again a few moments later. Nobody was fooled. Asked by Rep. Ted Lieu whether he’d ever seen Trump fall asleep during a Cabinet meeting, Secretary of State Rubio responded defiantly like my great uncle. “That’s false. I’ve never seen him fall asleep. On the contrary, the guy doesn’t sleep — he calls me at 2 in the morning. He calls me at 5 in the morning.” Lieu’s response was to pull up a clip of Trump with his eyes shut while Rubio himself was speaking at a Cabinet meeting. Then he played another one. Rubio, it turns out, might be the one who is just resting his eyes, asleep at the switch while his hypersomniac boss drifts into never-never land. Look, I get it. Meetings are boring, especially when you don’t have the floor. I’ve spent three decades in corporate America. I know exactly what it looks like when the boss, and myself, and others in the room, are losing the battle with drooping eyelids in a long meeting. Most of us have been there. However, most of us weren’t 80 years old, running on a diet of fast food and anger, and posting Truth Social memes until 3 a.m., and theoretically steering the most consequential country on the planet the next day. There is a whopping difference between a bored executive or subordinate and a president who can’t stay awake at his own events, and the documented record of the last seven months makes it impossible to look away. November 6, 2025: During a White House drug pricing announcement in the Oval Office, Getty photographer Andrew Harnik captured Trump slumped at the Resolute Desk, eyes closed, surrounded by aides who kept right on talking. The Washington Post reviewed multiple video feeds and calculated Trump spent nearly 20 minutes fighting to keep his eyes open. Sure sounds like Uncle Lawrence. December 2, 2025 . At a two-hour Cabinet meeting, Trump repeatedly shut his eyes while his own senior officials spoke. He later offered this explanation, which I will grant is at least honest: “They’re boring as hell.” He added: “I didn’t sleep. I just closed them because I wanted to get the hell outta here.” Spoken like my cranky Uncle Lawrence. February 19, 2026 : Two and a half hours into his own “Board of Peace” Gaza summit — a joke of a meeting he convened, with leaders from two dozen countries that no one has heard of — cameras caught Trump with his eyes closed. He didn't sleep. He was just deeply concentrating. With his eyes shut. For an extended period. Wake up Uncle Lawrence! May 11, 2026 : During a maternal health event in the Oval Office, video showed Trump’s eyes closed for roughly 17 seconds at the Resolute Desk. The White House’s official Rapid Response account fired back at a Reuters post, one that hadn’t even accused Trump of sleeping, just included a photo, with: *“He was blinking, you absolute moron.” The response became an instant meme. Rep. Lieu replied : “That is a verrrrrrrrryyyyy long blink.” The Democrats’ official account dubbed him “ Commander-in-Sleep .” May 26, 2026 : Memorial Day at Arlington. At the National Memorial Day Observance, with Gold Star families in the audience honoring the 13 service members killed in the Iran war, cameras caught Trump with his head bowed and eyes closed during Pete Hegseth’s remarks. He was sleeping standing up! That’s something Uncle Lawrence could never do. It should be noted that his third hospital visit in 13 months came the following day. The White House said he wasn’t sleeping. This whole thing is so comatose with irony. Trump spent years weaponizing “Sleepy Joe” against Biden. In 2021, when Biden appeared to nod off at a climate conference, Trump sent a mass email : “Nobody that has true enthusiasm and belief in a subject will ever fall asleep!” He yammered and hammered the “Sleepy Joe” label through 2022, 2023, and deep into the 2024 campaign. “He falls asleep at every single event,” Trump barked in June 2024. And if this doesn’t make you double-over with laughter, Trump once said , “How do you fall asleep when cameras are raging, right?” Then, on May 7, 2026, right in the middle of his own napping spree, Trump posted an AI-generated image on Truth Social showing Biden asleep in the Oval Office wearing pajamas, with Barack Obama wheeling in a box labeled “AUTOPEN.” Caption: *“A highly accurate depiction of the Sleepy Joe Biden Administration. Tremendous damage done but, WE’RE BACK!!!”* Admittedly, my Uncle Lawrence was not a warm and fuzzy guy, but he wasn’t a conceited, hypocritical jerk like Donald Trump. And what’s more? Uncle Lawrence was in his mid-80s, so his battle with keeping his eyes open is a harbinger for Trump. Trump turns 80 in a week. These incidents will not decrease. They will increase. His eyes will become heavier and heavier. The question Rep. Lieu was really asking Rubio what happens in the situation room, for example, when the cameras aren’t there . It never got answered, because Rubio just kept talking with his eyes wide shut. So while Trump sleeps on the job, don’t worry, because your grocery bill isn't keeping him awake. Or your gas bills, your electric bills. Trump, who promised he’d fix all of it on Day One, has more pressing matters — his eye-lids pressing against each other.

Verified checkmarkFact Checked (1)

Latest Fact Checks

Epstein in Israel: Why conspiracy theories refuse to die

Epstein in Israel: Why conspiracy theories refuse to die

Film Daily

Explore how Epstein ties to Israel keep sparking search spikes, from Barak’s emails to unverified FBI memos, and why the conspiracy never dies. The post Epstein in Israel: Why conspiracy theories refuse to die appeared first on Film Daily .

Verified checkmarkFact Checked (1)
Bears fans weigh in on Hammond, assign blame for dysfunction in this edition of 'Polling Place'

Bears fans weigh in on Hammond, assign blame for dysfunction in this edition of 'Polling Place'

Chicago Suntimes

<p>A bunch of you must be pretty bummed about the <a class="Link" href="https://chicago.suntimes.com/bears" target="_blank" >Bears</a> claiming they’re <a class="Link" href="https://chicago.suntimes.com/bears/2026/06/05/hammond-bears-chicago-indiana-nfl-george-mccaskey-kevin-warren-mike-braun-wolf-lake" target="_blank" >moving forward in their relationship with Hammond, Indiana</a>.</p><p>Or excited.</p><p>Or outraged.</p><p>Or apathetic.</p><p>Sheesh, will you make up your minds?</p><div class="RelatedList Enhancement" data-module data-align-center> <div class="RelatedList-title">Related</div> <ul class="RelatedList-items"> <li class="RelatedList-items-item"> <a class="Link" href="https://chicago.suntimes.com/bears/2026/06/05/hammond-bears-chicago-indiana-nfl-george-mccaskey-kevin-warren-mike-braun-wolf-lake" >The Hammond Bears? You gotta be bleepin’ us</a> </li> <li class="RelatedList-items-item"> <a class="Link" href="https://chicago.suntimes.com/bears/2026/06/05/bears-hammond-indiana-board-directors-vote-stadium-arlington-heights-nfl" >It’s Indiana: Bears’ board of directors votes to push stadium to Hammond</a> </li> <li class="RelatedList-items-item"> <a class="Link" href="https://chicago.suntimes.com/halas-intrigue/2026/06/05/bears-stadium-hammond-indiana-podcast-halas-intrigue" target="_blank" >Halas Intrigue podcast: Are the Bears going to Hammond? Or are they bluffing?</a> </li> </ul> </div> <p>In this edition of “Polling Place,” your home for Sun-Times sports polls on the social platform X, we asked for the word that best describes your reaction to all this over-the-state-line stadium business.</p><p>“I’m outraged at our so-called leaders who drove away another taxpaying-job-creating business,” @GaryBrussell24 commented.</p><p>“I’m bummed,” @HSAddict697 wrote, “but also happy for Hammond that something might help its economy.”</p><p>We wanted to know if you’ll support the Bears more, less or the same if they play in Hammond.</p><p>“More,” offered @JerryFo69130849, one of the few respondents in that camp.</p><p>Last, we asked who’s most responsible for the protracted difficulty surrounding a potential Bears stadium: the Bears, City Hall or Springfield?</p><p>Bears president/CEO Kevin Warren got @BuckKodiak’s vote, but @FPesche29037 is blaming Gov. JB Pritzker. Several commented along the lines of, “All of the above.”</p><p>On to the polls:</p><p><b>Poll No. 1: Which word best describes your reaction to the Bears’ announcing they’re moving forward with a stadium project in Hammond, Indiana?</b></p><div class="Enhancement" data-align-center><div class="Enhancement-item"> <div class="ExternalContent-wrapper" > <div class="TweetUrl"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">It’s time for a Bears edition of “Polling Place.” Let us hear from you! Selected comments will appear in Sunday's paper.<br><br>Poll No. 1: Which word best describes your reaction to the Bears’ announcing they’re moving forward with a stadium project in Hammond, Indiana?</p>— Chicago Sun-Times (@Suntimes) <a href="https://x.com/Suntimes/status/2062955992946504180?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 5, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> </div> </div> </div></div><p><b>Upshot: </b>No, that’s certainly not a lot of excitement. But there’s lots of time to let this Hammond thing sink in and get used to the idea, and many people will end up doing just that if the Bears go that route. Which — key note — the Bears still might not.</p><p><b>Poll No. 2: Will you support the Bears more, less or the same if they play home games across the state line?</b></p><div class="Enhancement" data-align-center><div class="Enhancement-item"> <div class="ExternalContent-wrapper" > <div class="TweetUrl"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Poll No. 2: Will you support the Bears more, less or the same if they play home games across the state line?</p>— Chicago Sun-Times (@Suntimes) <a href="https://x.com/Suntimes/status/2062955994901082506?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 5, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> </div> </div> </div></div><p><i>a. More (3.8%)</i></p><p><i>b. Less (33.8%)</i></p><p><i>c. The same (62.5%)</i></p><p><b>Upshot: </b>What’s the alternative to sticking by the Bears? Lambeau Field is even farther from Chicago than Hammond, believe it or not, so switching allegiances to the Packers is out. Oh, please, as if it was ever in.</p><p><b>Poll No. 3: Who’s most responsible for how messy the Bears stadium saga has been?</b></p><div class="Enhancement" data-align-center><div class="Enhancement-item"> <div class="ExternalContent-wrapper" > <div class="TweetUrl"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Poll No. 3: Who’s most responsible for how messy the Bears stadium saga has been?</p>— Chicago Sun-Times (@Suntimes) <a href="https://x.com/Suntimes/status/2062955996813639820?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 5, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> </div> </div> </div></div><p><i>a. The Bears (51.8%)</i></p><p><i>b. City Hall (15.9%)</i></p><p><i>c. Springfield (32.3%)</i></p><p><b>Upshot: </b>Everybody has blown it. And, look, if you want to throw 1% of the blame Matt Eberflus’ way just for old times’ sake, go ahead. Who’s counting?</p>

Verified checkmarkFact Checked (1)
Ukraine war briefing: Kyiv unleashes hundreds of drones on Russia after Putin rejected Zelenskyy meeting

Ukraine war briefing: Kyiv unleashes hundreds of drones on Russia after Putin rejected Zelenskyy meeting

The Guardian

Ukraine targets St Petersburg in wave of strikes; Keir Starmer to host Volodymyr Zelenskyy and EU leaders for talks. What we know on day 1,565 Ukraine fired hundreds of drones at Russia early on Saturday, leaving one person dead and setting an oil depot ablaze on the final day of Russia’s flagship economic forum in St Petersburg, officials said. Many of the drones targeted St Petersburg itself, the second Ukrainian attack on the city in less than a week , with Ukraine’s SBU security services saying it had hit a naval base. The strikes come a day after the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, rejected Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s proposal for a meeting , drawing criticism from the Ukrainian president, who accused him of “choosing war again”. More than 140 drones were shot down over the Leningrad region, which surrounds St Petersburg, governor Aleksandr Drozdenko said. The city’s governor, Alexander Beglov, issued a rare call for residents to stay indoors during the attack . “Russian air defences prevented any damage. The condition of the three injured is assessed as minor and they have been discharged,” he said. Russian air defences intercepted a total of 376 drones over the regions of “Belgorod, Bryansk, Kaluga, Kursk, Leningrad, Novgorod, Oryol, Pskov, Rostov, Ryazan, Smolensk, Tver, and Tula, the Moscow region, Crimea Republic, Abkhazia Republic, and over the waters of the Azov and Black Seas”, Russia’s defence ministry said. Ukraine’s SBU said it had targeted St Petersburg’s Kronstadt naval base, as well as “the Russian Navy’s 15th Arsenal in the Leningrad region” . The attacks also sparked a fire at an oil depot in the southern town of Ust-Labinsk, while drone debris killed a man in the western Tver region, according to local officials. Zelenskyy described the strikes as a “just response” to Russian aggression against Ukraine . “It is time to end this war. But Russia’s ruler wants to keep fighting. That is why Ukrainian sanctions against this aggression are working,” he said on X. “Any manifestation of injustice against Ukraine will receive a just response.” Russia renewed its strikes on Ukraine early on Saturday. A Russian drone killed a 64-year-old man in the southern Mykolaiv region , while a strike on the nearby Zaporizhzhia region wounded a 10-year-old boy and his father, regional authorities said. Russian drone and artillery attacks in Ukraine’s central Dnipropetrovsk region killed one person and left three others wounded, regional governor Oleksandr Ganzha wrote on Telegram. Russian forces also attacked two civilian search and rescue vessels in Ukrainian waters, causing injuries , Ukraine’s deputy prime minister Oleksiy Kuleba said on Saturday. “The enemy launched strikes on two boats of the maritime search and rescue service which were carrying out a humanitarian mission within the Ukrainian sea corridor,” he wrote on Telegram, referring to a Black Sea route used to take vessels to Romanian ports. “Unfortunately, there are injured. Evacuation by boats of the Ukrainian navy is currently under way.” The UK prime minister, Keir Starmer, will host Zelenskyy, Emmanuel Macron and Friedrich Merz for talks in Downing Street on Sunday to discuss support for Ukraine. The Ukrainian leader will visit the UK with the French president and German chancellor after a week of heightened hostilities and Vladimir Putin’s rejection of his proposal of face-to-face talks on Moscow’s war. The three countries meeting the Ukrainian leader are some of Kyiv’s staunchest allies. The UK and France are leading the “coalition of the willing” initiative to provide security guarantees for Ukraine as part of a peace process. Continue reading...

Verified checkmarkFact Checked (1)
Yemen: Huthis Should Free UN, Civil Society Staff

Yemen: Huthis Should Free UN, Civil Society Staff

Amnesty International

The de facto Huthi authorities in Yemen should immediately and unconditionally release the dozens of staff from the United Nations and Yemeni and international civil society organizations who have been arbitrarily detained over the last two years, Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies, Human Rights Watch, and Amnesty International said today. The Huthis’ arbitrary arrests of humanitarian workers has a direct impact on the delivery of lifesaving assistance to people in critical need of aid. [...] The post Yemen: Huthis Should Free UN, Civil Society Staff appeared first on Amnesty International .

Verified checkmarkFact Checked (1)
'Hoo boy': Pete Hegseth slammed by both sides after 'huge own goal' offends Christian sect

'Hoo boy': Pete Hegseth slammed by both sides after 'huge own goal' offends Christian sect

Raw Story

Pete Hegseth's decision to strip the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints of its Christian designation in the Pentagon's new religion classification system has ignited a rare cross-aisle pile-on, with Republican lawmakers, conservative commentators and Democratic senators lining up to call it a mistake. As Raw Story reported , Sen. John Curtis (R-UT) moved quickly Saturday to condemn the change as "unacceptable," saying he was working to reverse it. He wasn't alone. Rep. Celeste Maloy (R-UT) — a Utah Republican congresswoman — stopped short of criticizing Hegseth directly but made clear where she stood on the underlying question. "Members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are Christians," she wrote on X. "We worship Jesus Christ, strive to follow His teachings, and His name is even in the name of our Church. Just last year, President Trump himself recognized Latter-day Saints as Christians." She said she looked forward to "conversations that will ensure all service members receive the religious support and First Amendment protections they deserve." Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT), whose handle is @BasedMikeLee, kept it simple: "Can anyone tell me why The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was left out of the list of Christian churches?" The answer, based on the list published by Hegseth's office, is that the Pentagon placed LDS in its own standalone category — "Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (CJ)" — separate from the two dozen denominations listed under the "Christian" umbrella. Henry Olsen, a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center and a prominent conservative commentator, said Hegseth shot himself in the foot: "Failing to characterize Mormons as Christians is a huge own goal by Hegseth." The backlash wasn't limited to the right. Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) — an Arizona Democrat whose state has a significant LDS population — replied directly to Lee: "I don't know why but I am with you. This needs to be fixed ASAP." Not everyone was displeased. Milo Yiannopoulos, the far-right provocateur who goes by @Nero on X, used the moment to attack the LDS church itself. "It's not a religion. It's certainly not Christian," he wrote. "LDS is referred to by academics as a 'new religious movement,' polite sociological jargon for cult." RedState writer Bonchie offered a more succinct assessment of the situation: "Hoo boy." The classification overhaul was announced by Sean Parnell, Hegseth's assistant for public affairs, who framed the reduction from more than 200 categories to 31 as a streamlining effort to help "religious support personnel" provide "spiritual care to our warfighters." Whether it accomplishes that — or simply hands Hegseth's critics a gift — is now a matter of bipartisan consensus. I don’t know why but I am with you. This needs be fixed ASAP. https://t.co/LhVKH6ZgtX — Ruben Gallego (@RubenGallego) June 6, 2026

Verified checkmarkFact Checked (1)
“Kituwah is our home”: 30th Annual Kituwah Celebration held

“Kituwah is our home”: 30th Annual Kituwah Celebration held

The Cherokee One Feather

Thirty years ago, the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians (EBCI) purchased Kituwah – the Mother Town of the Cherokee – marking the return of the sacred site to the Tribe. The 30th Annual Kituwah Celebration, held in recognition of that important event in EBCI history, was held at the site on Saturday, June 6. The post “Kituwah is our home”: 30th Annual Kituwah Celebration held appeared first on The Cherokee One Feather .

Verified checkmarkFact Checked (1)

All Fact Checks

Epstein in Israel: Why conspiracy theories refuse to die

Epstein in Israel: Why conspiracy theories refuse to die

Film Daily

Explore how Epstein ties to Israel keep sparking search spikes, from Barak’s emails to unverified FBI memos, and why the conspiracy never dies. The post Epstein in Israel: Why conspiracy theories refuse to die appeared first on Film Daily .

Verified checkmarkFact Checked (1)
Bears fans weigh in on Hammond, assign blame for dysfunction in this edition of 'Polling Place'

Bears fans weigh in on Hammond, assign blame for dysfunction in this edition of 'Polling Place'

Chicago Suntimes

<p>A bunch of you must be pretty bummed about the <a class="Link" href="https://chicago.suntimes.com/bears" target="_blank" >Bears</a> claiming they’re <a class="Link" href="https://chicago.suntimes.com/bears/2026/06/05/hammond-bears-chicago-indiana-nfl-george-mccaskey-kevin-warren-mike-braun-wolf-lake" target="_blank" >moving forward in their relationship with Hammond, Indiana</a>.</p><p>Or excited.</p><p>Or outraged.</p><p>Or apathetic.</p><p>Sheesh, will you make up your minds?</p><div class="RelatedList Enhancement" data-module data-align-center> <div class="RelatedList-title">Related</div> <ul class="RelatedList-items"> <li class="RelatedList-items-item"> <a class="Link" href="https://chicago.suntimes.com/bears/2026/06/05/hammond-bears-chicago-indiana-nfl-george-mccaskey-kevin-warren-mike-braun-wolf-lake" >The Hammond Bears? You gotta be bleepin’ us</a> </li> <li class="RelatedList-items-item"> <a class="Link" href="https://chicago.suntimes.com/bears/2026/06/05/bears-hammond-indiana-board-directors-vote-stadium-arlington-heights-nfl" >It’s Indiana: Bears’ board of directors votes to push stadium to Hammond</a> </li> <li class="RelatedList-items-item"> <a class="Link" href="https://chicago.suntimes.com/halas-intrigue/2026/06/05/bears-stadium-hammond-indiana-podcast-halas-intrigue" target="_blank" >Halas Intrigue podcast: Are the Bears going to Hammond? Or are they bluffing?</a> </li> </ul> </div> <p>In this edition of “Polling Place,” your home for Sun-Times sports polls on the social platform X, we asked for the word that best describes your reaction to all this over-the-state-line stadium business.</p><p>“I’m outraged at our so-called leaders who drove away another taxpaying-job-creating business,” @GaryBrussell24 commented.</p><p>“I’m bummed,” @HSAddict697 wrote, “but also happy for Hammond that something might help its economy.”</p><p>We wanted to know if you’ll support the Bears more, less or the same if they play in Hammond.</p><p>“More,” offered @JerryFo69130849, one of the few respondents in that camp.</p><p>Last, we asked who’s most responsible for the protracted difficulty surrounding a potential Bears stadium: the Bears, City Hall or Springfield?</p><p>Bears president/CEO Kevin Warren got @BuckKodiak’s vote, but @FPesche29037 is blaming Gov. JB Pritzker. Several commented along the lines of, “All of the above.”</p><p>On to the polls:</p><p><b>Poll No. 1: Which word best describes your reaction to the Bears’ announcing they’re moving forward with a stadium project in Hammond, Indiana?</b></p><div class="Enhancement" data-align-center><div class="Enhancement-item"> <div class="ExternalContent-wrapper" > <div class="TweetUrl"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">It’s time for a Bears edition of “Polling Place.” Let us hear from you! Selected comments will appear in Sunday's paper.<br><br>Poll No. 1: Which word best describes your reaction to the Bears’ announcing they’re moving forward with a stadium project in Hammond, Indiana?</p>— Chicago Sun-Times (@Suntimes) <a href="https://x.com/Suntimes/status/2062955992946504180?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 5, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> </div> </div> </div></div><p><b>Upshot: </b>No, that’s certainly not a lot of excitement. But there’s lots of time to let this Hammond thing sink in and get used to the idea, and many people will end up doing just that if the Bears go that route. Which — key note — the Bears still might not.</p><p><b>Poll No. 2: Will you support the Bears more, less or the same if they play home games across the state line?</b></p><div class="Enhancement" data-align-center><div class="Enhancement-item"> <div class="ExternalContent-wrapper" > <div class="TweetUrl"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Poll No. 2: Will you support the Bears more, less or the same if they play home games across the state line?</p>— Chicago Sun-Times (@Suntimes) <a href="https://x.com/Suntimes/status/2062955994901082506?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 5, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> </div> </div> </div></div><p><i>a. More (3.8%)</i></p><p><i>b. Less (33.8%)</i></p><p><i>c. The same (62.5%)</i></p><p><b>Upshot: </b>What’s the alternative to sticking by the Bears? Lambeau Field is even farther from Chicago than Hammond, believe it or not, so switching allegiances to the Packers is out. Oh, please, as if it was ever in.</p><p><b>Poll No. 3: Who’s most responsible for how messy the Bears stadium saga has been?</b></p><div class="Enhancement" data-align-center><div class="Enhancement-item"> <div class="ExternalContent-wrapper" > <div class="TweetUrl"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">Poll No. 3: Who’s most responsible for how messy the Bears stadium saga has been?</p>— Chicago Sun-Times (@Suntimes) <a href="https://x.com/Suntimes/status/2062955996813639820?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">June 5, 2026</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.x.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script> </div> </div> </div></div><p><i>a. The Bears (51.8%)</i></p><p><i>b. City Hall (15.9%)</i></p><p><i>c. Springfield (32.3%)</i></p><p><b>Upshot: </b>Everybody has blown it. And, look, if you want to throw 1% of the blame Matt Eberflus’ way just for old times’ sake, go ahead. Who’s counting?</p>

Verified checkmarkFact Checked (1)
'She just goes a little haywire': Nancy Mace's past catches up with her primary bid

'She just goes a little haywire': Nancy Mace's past catches up with her primary bid

Raw Story

Rep. Nancy Mace’s attempt to leap from the House of Representatives to the governor’s mansion in South Carolina has more difficulties than Donald Trump ignoring her and endorsing opponent Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette. As part of a Politico interview with the controversial lawmaker, who still considers herself “MAGA” despite the president turning his back on her, one South Carolina GOP insider claimed she has enough personal baggage to give conservative voters pause. Trump's endorsement of Evette carries decisive weight in South Carolina's reliably Republican environment. Historical voting patterns suggest Evette has effectively secured her place in a runoff, leaving Mace and three other Republicans scrambling for the second ballot spot. According to the report, the turning point for the GOP lawmaker came in November, when Mace's public meltdown at Charleston Airport generated national headlines. According to an airport authority report, Mace unleashed a profanity-laced tirade at law enforcement officers and TSA agents for failing to meet her at a prearranged pickup location—even as they walked her to her flight. The incident proved more damaging than expected. "I think the airport thing hurt her more than the [Epstein] thing," said Terry Sullivan, a longtime South Carolina Republican operative unaffiliated in the race. "She's had really strong debate performances, she's articulate, she's right on the issues for these folks, but then she just goes a little haywire." Mace's response only amplified the damage. Days after the incident, she held a Charleston press conference defending her actions and dismissing the airport authority's report as a "political hit job." "Did I drop an f-bomb? I hope I did," she said at the time, a statement that drew swift rebukes from fellow South Carolina Republicans. Sen. Tim Scott issued a blistering statement condemning her language and treatment of airport officials. Sen. Lindsey Graham piled on with criticism of his own. Months later, Mace remains defiant. She attributed her airport confrontations to threats against her safety and the alleged partisan harassment she endures. "I get over a thousand death threats a year, and I'm the only one that doesn't get security when traveling. In fact, the last three times I've had an altercation or been accosted has been at an airport, particularly the Charleston airport, because the left has lost their mind," she told Politico.

Verified checkmarkFact Checked (1)
Ukraine war briefing: Kyiv unleashes hundreds of drones on Russia after Putin rejected Zelenskyy meeting

Ukraine war briefing: Kyiv unleashes hundreds of drones on Russia after Putin rejected Zelenskyy meeting

The Guardian

Ukraine targets St Petersburg in wave of strikes; Keir Starmer to host Volodymyr Zelenskyy and EU leaders for talks. What we know on day 1,565 Ukraine fired hundreds of drones at Russia early on Saturday, leaving one person dead and setting an oil depot ablaze on the final day of Russia’s flagship economic forum in St Petersburg, officials said. Many of the drones targeted St Petersburg itself, the second Ukrainian attack on the city in less than a week , with Ukraine’s SBU security services saying it had hit a naval base. The strikes come a day after the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, rejected Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s proposal for a meeting , drawing criticism from the Ukrainian president, who accused him of “choosing war again”. More than 140 drones were shot down over the Leningrad region, which surrounds St Petersburg, governor Aleksandr Drozdenko said. The city’s governor, Alexander Beglov, issued a rare call for residents to stay indoors during the attack . “Russian air defences prevented any damage. The condition of the three injured is assessed as minor and they have been discharged,” he said. Russian air defences intercepted a total of 376 drones over the regions of “Belgorod, Bryansk, Kaluga, Kursk, Leningrad, Novgorod, Oryol, Pskov, Rostov, Ryazan, Smolensk, Tver, and Tula, the Moscow region, Crimea Republic, Abkhazia Republic, and over the waters of the Azov and Black Seas”, Russia’s defence ministry said. Ukraine’s SBU said it had targeted St Petersburg’s Kronstadt naval base, as well as “the Russian Navy’s 15th Arsenal in the Leningrad region” . The attacks also sparked a fire at an oil depot in the southern town of Ust-Labinsk, while drone debris killed a man in the western Tver region, according to local officials. Zelenskyy described the strikes as a “just response” to Russian aggression against Ukraine . “It is time to end this war. But Russia’s ruler wants to keep fighting. That is why Ukrainian sanctions against this aggression are working,” he said on X. “Any manifestation of injustice against Ukraine will receive a just response.” Russia renewed its strikes on Ukraine early on Saturday. A Russian drone killed a 64-year-old man in the southern Mykolaiv region , while a strike on the nearby Zaporizhzhia region wounded a 10-year-old boy and his father, regional authorities said. Russian drone and artillery attacks in Ukraine’s central Dnipropetrovsk region killed one person and left three others wounded, regional governor Oleksandr Ganzha wrote on Telegram. Russian forces also attacked two civilian search and rescue vessels in Ukrainian waters, causing injuries , Ukraine’s deputy prime minister Oleksiy Kuleba said on Saturday. “The enemy launched strikes on two boats of the maritime search and rescue service which were carrying out a humanitarian mission within the Ukrainian sea corridor,” he wrote on Telegram, referring to a Black Sea route used to take vessels to Romanian ports. “Unfortunately, there are injured. Evacuation by boats of the Ukrainian navy is currently under way.” The UK prime minister, Keir Starmer, will host Zelenskyy, Emmanuel Macron and Friedrich Merz for talks in Downing Street on Sunday to discuss support for Ukraine. The Ukrainian leader will visit the UK with the French president and German chancellor after a week of heightened hostilities and Vladimir Putin’s rejection of his proposal of face-to-face talks on Moscow’s war. The three countries meeting the Ukrainian leader are some of Kyiv’s staunchest allies. The UK and France are leading the “coalition of the willing” initiative to provide security guarantees for Ukraine as part of a peace process. Continue reading...

Verified checkmarkFact Checked (1)
Yemen: Huthis Should Free UN, Civil Society Staff

Yemen: Huthis Should Free UN, Civil Society Staff

Amnesty International

The de facto Huthi authorities in Yemen should immediately and unconditionally release the dozens of staff from the United Nations and Yemeni and international civil society organizations who have been arbitrarily detained over the last two years, Cairo Institute for Human Rights Studies, Human Rights Watch, and Amnesty International said today. The Huthis’ arbitrary arrests of humanitarian workers has a direct impact on the delivery of lifesaving assistance to people in critical need of aid. [...] The post Yemen: Huthis Should Free UN, Civil Society Staff appeared first on Amnesty International .

Verified checkmarkFact Checked (1)
'Hoo boy': Pete Hegseth slammed by both sides after 'huge own goal' offends Christian sect

'Hoo boy': Pete Hegseth slammed by both sides after 'huge own goal' offends Christian sect

Raw Story

Pete Hegseth's decision to strip the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints of its Christian designation in the Pentagon's new religion classification system has ignited a rare cross-aisle pile-on, with Republican lawmakers, conservative commentators and Democratic senators lining up to call it a mistake. As Raw Story reported , Sen. John Curtis (R-UT) moved quickly Saturday to condemn the change as "unacceptable," saying he was working to reverse it. He wasn't alone. Rep. Celeste Maloy (R-UT) — a Utah Republican congresswoman — stopped short of criticizing Hegseth directly but made clear where she stood on the underlying question. "Members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are Christians," she wrote on X. "We worship Jesus Christ, strive to follow His teachings, and His name is even in the name of our Church. Just last year, President Trump himself recognized Latter-day Saints as Christians." She said she looked forward to "conversations that will ensure all service members receive the religious support and First Amendment protections they deserve." Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT), whose handle is @BasedMikeLee, kept it simple: "Can anyone tell me why The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints was left out of the list of Christian churches?" The answer, based on the list published by Hegseth's office, is that the Pentagon placed LDS in its own standalone category — "Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints (CJ)" — separate from the two dozen denominations listed under the "Christian" umbrella. Henry Olsen, a senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center and a prominent conservative commentator, said Hegseth shot himself in the foot: "Failing to characterize Mormons as Christians is a huge own goal by Hegseth." The backlash wasn't limited to the right. Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-AZ) — an Arizona Democrat whose state has a significant LDS population — replied directly to Lee: "I don't know why but I am with you. This needs to be fixed ASAP." Not everyone was displeased. Milo Yiannopoulos, the far-right provocateur who goes by @Nero on X, used the moment to attack the LDS church itself. "It's not a religion. It's certainly not Christian," he wrote. "LDS is referred to by academics as a 'new religious movement,' polite sociological jargon for cult." RedState writer Bonchie offered a more succinct assessment of the situation: "Hoo boy." The classification overhaul was announced by Sean Parnell, Hegseth's assistant for public affairs, who framed the reduction from more than 200 categories to 31 as a streamlining effort to help "religious support personnel" provide "spiritual care to our warfighters." Whether it accomplishes that — or simply hands Hegseth's critics a gift — is now a matter of bipartisan consensus. I don’t know why but I am with you. This needs be fixed ASAP. https://t.co/LhVKH6ZgtX — Ruben Gallego (@RubenGallego) June 6, 2026

Verified checkmarkFact Checked (1)
Federal officials accused of 'strange secrecy' as court cases fast-tracked

Federal officials accused of 'strange secrecy' as court cases fast-tracked

Raw Story

Lawyers representing immigrants being swept up by the Department of Homeland Security are raising the alarm that federal authorities are deploying new tactics to fast-track deportations. According to New York Times reporting, federal officials have begun pushing dozens of additional cases onto court dockets on specific days to rapidly process asylum and other immigration claims. The secret acceleration started without any public notification from the administration. The impact has been dramatic, observers told the Times. Some immigration judges have seen their caseloads double and triple, raising concerns that cases are being processed too quickly for proper legal review. The Executive Office for Immigration Review, the Justice Department agency overseeing the immigration court system, defended the larger caseloads as a result of hiring new judges and described them as necessary to address a backlog of more than 3 million cases this year. But immigration lawyers and rights groups argue the acceleration creates a fundamentally unfair process . "Everything related to these large dockets or mass dockets is shrouded in such a strange secrecy," Gracie Willis, an attorney with the National Immigration Project, told the Times. "Our confirmation that they were even happening really came from going to the court on Monday and seeing the large lines of people standing outside," she claimed, referring to proceedings she observed in New Orleans. Lawyers reported witnessing judges processing groups of people simultaneously despite their different cases and legal claims. In one instance, a judge heard 15 people at once, cycling through Arabic, Spanish, and Creole interpretations. On a single Monday and Tuesday, the Times is reporting, 89 people in one court were declared absent and therefore deportable. "And that is not because they were 'the worst of the worst.' It is because they had a hearing scheduled that they were not able to attend for a variety of reasons," Willis stated. The administration's push comes amid broader upheaval in Trump's immigration strategy. The report notes that on Friday, a federal judge rejected the government's indefinite hold on asylum applications filed with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services and on immigration applications from 39 countries where people had been unable to obtain green cards and citizenship. That ruling is not expected to significantly impact immigration court proceedings.

Verified checkmarkFact Checked (1)
“Kituwah is our home”: 30th Annual Kituwah Celebration held

“Kituwah is our home”: 30th Annual Kituwah Celebration held

The Cherokee One Feather

Thirty years ago, the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians (EBCI) purchased Kituwah – the Mother Town of the Cherokee – marking the return of the sacred site to the Tribe. The 30th Annual Kituwah Celebration, held in recognition of that important event in EBCI history, was held at the site on Saturday, June 6. The post “Kituwah is our home”: 30th Annual Kituwah Celebration held appeared first on The Cherokee One Feather .

Verified checkmarkFact Checked (1)
PolitiFact Rates Iowa GOP Senate Candidate 'False' For True Ad

PolitiFact Rates Iowa GOP Senate Candidate 'False' For True Ad

Newsbusters

PolitiFact Rates Iowa GOP Senate Candidate 'False' For True Ad PolitiFact’s Caleb McCullough was at it again with more Senate campaign cherry-picking shenanigans on Friday . This time McCullough focused on Iowa Republican Ashley Hinson’s recent ad that accused Democrat Josh Turek of supporting sex changes for minors. McCullough called it “false,” but his actual article suggested it was not quite that simple. The controversy arose over an ad that “makes two similar but distinct claims. Its narration says Turek ‘supports kids changing gender without parental consent.’ But the on-screen text says ‘sex changes for kids,’ while video of surgeons in an operating room plays behind an image of Turek. Hinson’s social media post sharing the ad also used the phrase ‘sex changes for kids.’” If McCullough focused on the narrator, it is likely he would never have written the article because PolitiFact tends not to publish articles about Republicans being true. Instead, McCullough focused on the text: ‘Sex change’ is not a standard medical term. Gender-affirming care can include a range of approaches to support a person's gender identity including, for minors, using a different name or pronouns. According to medical best practices, gender-affirming treatments are available only to adolescents and can include puberty blockers, hormone therapy and in rare cases, surgeries for older teens. Medical intervention for minors requires parental consent. The ad distorts Turek’s position. The law cited in the ad as evidence does not mention medical interventions or ‘sex changes.’ It has to do with notifying parents when a student expresses a different gender identity at school. Which is exactly what the narrator said and McCullough even admitted was correct: The ad cites Iowa's Senate File 496 , a 2023 law that regulated school library books with explicit themes and prohibited instruction on gender identity and sexual orientation. Turek voted against the bill. The Republican-led Legislature passed the bill and Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds signed it into law. The law requires school districts to inform parents if a student requests "an accommodation that is intended to affirm the student's gender identity," including requests that employees "address the student using a name or pronoun" that differs from the school’s records. McCullough also cited “Hinson campaign spokesperson Addie Lavis” as having “said the ad was not referencing gender-affirming surgeries. In an email to PolitiFact, she said the ad was using gender and sex ‘interchangeably as is the case under Iowa law and nowhere do we mention surgery.’" In that case, the ad is once again correct. Still, when it came to hormones for minors, McCullough tried to give Turek a pass, “Iowa lawmakers had already prohibited medical gender-affirming procedures for minors in 2023. Turek was not present for the vote on that bill, and the Iowa House Journal shows he was granted a leave of absence that day.” He then continued, “Citing the American Medical Association — which said in February that gender-affirming surgeries should ‘generally be reserved until adulthood’ — Turek campaign spokesperson Hannah Goss said he does not support gender-affirming surgeries for minors.” In his summary, McCullough used all that to conclude, “A separate bill the same year banned gender-affirming medical treatments for minors; Turek was absent from the vote. His campaign said he opposes such surgeries for minors.” Every single Democrat in the Iowa House of Representatives voted against the bill that banned gender-altering hormones for minors. There is no reason to believe that if Turek were present, he would have been the lone Democrat to join with Republicans. Alex Christy Sat, 06/06/2026 - 14:10 Marketing Timing Regular Search Engine Title PolitiFact Rates Iowa GOP Senate Candidate 'False' For True Ad CNS Commentary Off

Verified checkmarkFact Checked (1)
...

Page 1 of 201